Desk research vs direct partner interviews in France
What can we establish from public sources, and what needs a conversation?
Not settled here: What a firm will actually do. Neither method reaches that.
Four pages, each answering one question a software company runs into when France stops being an idea and becomes a budget line. They are grouped by the decision in front of you rather than by the date they were written.
None of them reports what French organisations told us. Where a claim rests on a law, a rule or a published figure, the page links the document and says when it was checked.
Settle what you can establish without asking anyone, work out who would have to sell or deploy your product here, then compare the routes you could commit to.
What can we establish from public sources, and what needs a conversation?
Not settled here: What a firm will actually do. Neither method reaches that.
Who sells and deploys software in France, and what does each of them want?
Not settled here: Whether a particular firm behaves like its category. That needs a conversation.
Which route into France fits the evidence we actually have?
Not settled here: Which route suits your product. That depends on how it reaches a buyer.
What should we verify before committing money and people to France?
Not settled here: Whether France is right for you. It sets out what to check, not the answer.
The rules are dull, and they are the point.
Write and say what you are trying to decide about France. We read everything ourselves and reply within two working days.